January 2009 Archives

Hobbledehoy

A youth between boy and man; an awkward, gawky young fellow.
"Oh gawky youth" is a phrase I may never have uttered aloud but which surfaces in my mind at times. My use of the phrase is meant as a reversal of the words on the frieze of the 92nd Street Y in Manhattan. That frieze quotes Ecclesiastes with the word "REJOICE, O YOUNG MAN, IN THY YOUTH," a phrase that seemed righteous to me when I saw its commanding presence on the wall of that (to me, at the time) august institution in 1990 but which new seems like a hoarse inspiration.

It is a bible verse whose providence I think could be challenged. Raw, barbaric yawps of youth are rarely beautiful or of much merit, but as a culture for which only the past is golden we mine youthful jeremiads for their sincerity and money-making potential. Depending on the context the verse could imply that one should exalt themselves in any medium they fancy, a philosophy which is possibly to blame for Karaoke.

In the more prescient context it reminds me of the impressive introductory address  given to the freshman class by the president of my college. He said "Screw up big time." He may have used expletives to make his point, which was that college and youth are the times in your life when screwing up is allowed, and when learning from mistakes is most valuable. These opportunities to get away with getting things wrong become fewer and fewer in life, and you would regret not screwing up if your life came crashing in under the weight of that first error of judgment.


 

Bleb

A small bubble in glass or on water.
"Bubbles?"

Puzzled pause.

"Bubbles?"

"Yeah. Bubbles."

This was the substance of a conversation between myself and a grade school friend as I attempted to describe to him the sensation brewing in my digestive system when I was nervous or experiencing anxiety.

In fact this sensation was virtually constant.

I might further have explicated the slight clenching feeling that turned in my stomach, a sensation others might describe as "that sinking feeling" portending some bad omen.

It was the bubbles, though, that perplexed my friend, and which seemed to require elaboration on my part.

Instead of expounding on the nuances of the bubbles I think I gave up on the topic, which I introduced to explain the back-story behind my status as the throw-up king throughout much of grade school.

The chief culprit behind my seemingly routine barf episodes, I thought, was a digestive tract sensitively tied to my nervous worries, the word "nervous" used not in its cliché sense of ego self-preservation but in the sense of involuntary bodily and mental tics arising in response to earthly matters of unnatural conceit.

The spontaneous vomiting I experienced through school has largely eased as an adult. I can, however, reliably expect to feel that clenching feeling of bubbles in my gut during and after an oft-repeated dream. In this dream I never graduated from college and had to go back to school (nearly 20 years later) to get my degree. In some of these dreams it seems I never even left school, and had been endlessly pursuing a college degree from 1986 to the present.

That dream is based in genuine anxieties I experienced as my college graduation approached in 1990 and it appeared I might not make it out in 4 years. I did graduate in 4 years through the magic of a crafty (and perfectly legitimate) sleight-of-hand called "retroactive credit." I invoked this trick to bump up some credits on my transcript, and after telling a few friends about it it seemed like everyone was doing it. In fact I'd say quite a number of people in my class who might have otherwise not graduated that year did so after learning about the retroactive credit loophole.

In retrospect it seems the stakes were nowhere near as high as I imagined them at the time. If I came up 2 credits short I would probably have been allowed to be part of the graduation ceremony, though my diploma folder would be empty until I finished a couple of courses either at the school or elsewhere.

It often takes me hours to snap out of that dream after I wake. A half day might pass before I stand up in my mind and announce that it can't be real, and that I do not have to return to school.

I would think that type of anxiety dream is common enough, but its vividness makes an hours-long impression on my wakened mind, renewing the turgid, bubbling gut-churn that has mostly vanished into my adulthood.

 

Boondoggle

Work of little or no value done merely to look busy.
I had an uneasy relationship with a college advisor who sponsored an Independent Reading for me. An Independent Reading is a form of coursework (done for credit) that covers material not included in any of the school's courses.

I don't know if my interest in Independent Readings was unusual or how many other people did them, but I ended up with two of them on my final transcript after making several attempts to find unique subjects for study and professors to sponsor.

The focus of my first Reading was the history of the recording industry and the way it influenced the development and history of music -- with particular focus on Thomas Edison. That was a great subject, one worthy of a full class I would think, and I seem to remember getting a good grade for that project. The freeform nature of the Reading suited me, and I looked for subject matter for another one.

I tried for a wide-ranging topic of the Phenomenology of Music, hoping to draw together disparate musicological resources -- everything from artwork on sheet music covers to subtleties of Rachmaninoff's orchestral scores -- into a coherent focus that accounted for human's interest in music.

I may have been reading too much Carl Dahlhaus at the time, as in retrospect I see that my vision for this Reading presumed obscurity right from the start, relying on the obtuseness of impenetrably allusive rhetoric.

Because of this seeming lack of direction the professor who sponsored the Reading became increasingly skeptical of it as the semester progressed. At one point he asked me, using a word I'd never heard until then, if this was "just a big boondoggle." I don't remember my reply but it seemed like a harsh question from one whose ardor for the project seemed limitless when he agreed to sponsor it. He was a new professor at the school and I came to think that he agreed to sponsor the Reading in a bit of newbie enthusiasm, going against what would have been better judgment had he thought about it more.

Nevertheless, by the end of the semester we were on the same page again, his enthusiasm renewed even as his time available to evaluate my work lessened. He never showed up to most of the scheduled meetings in the latter part of the year, but his evaluation of my final paper was glowing and I believe I got an A.

I don't know if the "boondoggle" comment had any influence over things or if I genuinely managed to convince the guy that my motives were sincere. My approach of taking seemingly disparate elements of study and reining them in under a broadly contoured theme must have come from my love of the television show "The Paper Chase," which aired on the Showtime cable network during my college years.

I may have imagined myself as the character of Hart, whose tenure as the editor of his law school's "Law Review" journal was embattled over Hart's desire to ask his writers to take the articles they had written (and assumed to be finished) and "turn it around" to see the stories from a point of view that none would expect.

Hart's heavy-lifting approach to the "Law Review" left his writers begging for mercy but ultimately earned him and the staff an unprecedented congratulatory visit from the mighty Professor Kingsfield, the imperious professor whose every word and tic seemed to speak volumes. In the history of the journal there was no memory of Kingsfield openly expressing admiration for any individual issue or article, but Hart's far-reaching approach to his first issue impressed Kingsfield and prompted his un-announced visit.

I never had my Kingsfield. I had good professors but none whose reputation and influence within their field of specialty even vaguely resembled the authority of Professor Kingsfield in "The Paper Chase." I think the closest I ever came to the Kingsfield form of tough-love education was the day I got the boondoggle question, and somehow I don't feel it challenged me much.

 

Shicer

A swindler, welsher, or cheat. A worthless thing; a failure.

I have no exposure to the Bernard Madoff scheme, nor am I aware of anyone I know affected by it, but I have followed the case with great interest.

To me the Madoff affair crystallizes the Wall Street economy of greed, entitlement, and illusory profits enriching those who most skillfully game the system. I expect more such schemes to be exposed in the coming months and years as regulators smart from being out-foxed by Madoff. I expect federal regulators to prosecute to the fullest extent those individuals responsible for even the most innocent accounting vagaries as Madoff, like Ken Lay before him, escapes through the ultimate loophole of death.

I think that this affair will only substantiate Main Street's distrust of Wall Street, and the wealth that formerly poured into the canyon of heroes will go elsewhere in search of immediate riches.

It is hard to say how I might feel if all my money was extinguished by fraud. In fact the question may be moot, as I simply can not imagine myself investing everything in one place. Call me financially promiscuous but I simply do not trust financial professionals, banks or federal regulators enough to trust any one of them.

If I found myself in the position of Madoff's former clients I can imagine being fooled by solid returns in a depression-like economy. While other investors perished I can imagine thinking "Hey, I'm smart enough to outwit most investors" and I would lay low, staying quiet about my good fortune.

By no means do I mean to suggest that I *do* think I'm smart enough to outwit the markets. I am imagining myself in the position of a Madoff investor. If my holdings did well through the worst of times I imagine that suspicion of the broker's techniques would not immediately top my list of concerns.

If television news coverage is to be believed (a dicey assumption at best) then it appears there is widespread  indignity over Madoff being allowed to stay in his luxury Manhattan apartment while the case is pending. Madoff has not been formally charged with anything, and most of what the public knows about the allegations is that he confessed the details of his scheme to his sons. We do not know the substance of that confession but talking heads and insta-pundits repeatedly declare that we do not need to know, and that the substance of Madoff's confession is irrelevant.

The Madoff case, we hear, is so extreme that the legal process should be skipped and Madoff sent to prison immediately and for the rest of his life.

Prosecutors seem to be courting public opinion and dualing with newspaper headlines by repeatedly bringing the matter before a judge only to be refused.

The consequences and reach of Madoff's fraud are extreme, but at the risk of sounding sympathetic to the man (I AM NOT) I think the judge's rulings on these matters are sound. The integrity of the legal system is a greater cause for prudence than the incarceration of one individual, however satisfying that imprisonment might be to those who have lost money to this man. Should judges choose to selectively skip the legal process for high-profile individuals then the system would be compromised and judges in other cases forced to consider the precedent in their caseloads.

 

Astragalomancy

Divination by means of small bones or dice.

 

 

I used to enjoy the feeling of being had by psychics and soothsayers promising glimpses into my future through palmreading or other bodily review. The act of consulting (and paying) someone to tell you your future is an open joke, I think. Still, there is a comfort and even reassurance in hearing a kindly voice offer encouraging news from the future.

I recall with bemusement a night in college when a friend and I tried to see into our futures with a Ouija board. I don't recall what my friend's questions were but I asked the Ouija (silently) where I was going to live after college. Only I knew the question as my friend and I placed the tips of our fingers on the planchette and waited for mystical adumbration to ensue.

At first the planchette moved to L, then Y. Then it went to H, then back to Y. Then it went back and forth over a dozen times between N and Y. At first we asked what "LYHYNYNY" might mean, until we noted that the planchette seemed to have settled in on NYNYNY, moving confidently between those 2 letters for many passes until we lifted our hands from the object.

The LY and the HY must have been warm-ups, we decided. The planchette had moved very slowly to those letters, but then very quickly and confidently between the N and the Y.

The Ouija, we decided, said I would live in New York, NY.

And I do.
 

 

Sgraffito

A form of decoration made by scratching through wet plaster on a wall or through slip on ceramic ware, showing a different-coloured under-surface.

 

 

I was at the center of a 5th grade arts and crafts scandal. At the core of the crisis: some of my model ships, paint-by-number portraits, string art, and other masterpieces.

The scandal began when the school's Art teacher decided to have a School Art Contest. She was the sole judge who decided which works from the student body were the best, the bestest, the most beastliest. It ended up being the only contest of its kind from my years of grade school.

I entered several items into the contest, including a model ship of the H.M.S. Bounty, a string art piece depicting a sailboat, and a couple of plaster-casted football players. I entered numerous other items, making me the school's most prolific contributor to the contest.

Alas, I won nothing. Not even an Honorable Mention, and for that matter not even an acknowledgement from the Art teacher as to why I was passed over. I never protested, but others seemed readily alarmed that my items, some of which were downright professional-looking, were all ignored.

I do not remember what type of items won the top awards, but even at the time I think I understood what the Art teacher was trying to say. I think she felt my stuff was not as genuinely creative as other people's clay urns and snakes made of putty. My model ship was out-of-the-box, assembled according to detailed instructions. I submitted a paint-by-numbers illustration of a fall foliage scene. The likenesses of the football players were created with a set of prefabricated casts purchased at a toy store.

In other words: none of this stuff was unique or creative. It was assembly line arts and crafts. She never told me that -- she never told me anything -- but it's a reasonable conclusion. I think she was also irked at the sheer quantity of items I entered into the contest.

She may have had a point, but scandal ensued anyway, and no one gave the recipients of her awards any credibility. I do not know if this situation contributed to her departure from the school (probably not) but with her exit at the end of the school year came the end of the School Art Contest.

I was not exactly popular in grade school, so the solidarity that I felt from my classmates was surprising. I remember it today as something of an aberration, though I can't say if the solidarity's uniqueness speaks for its credibility or for its childish self-righteousness.

 

Forsooth

In truth; in fact; certainly; very well.

 

 

Like most military families living in Laos, our house was tended to by a maid, a gardener, and a handy man, all of whose services were paid for by the U.S. military.

The maid was named Long.

Long's husband (the handyman) was named Soot (pronounced "suit").

Long and Soot had a baby named Chin.

Long's sister was named Sing. I do not recall if Sing worked at our house or elsewhere, but she lived at our house.

My sister and I, clever youngsters that we were, made up songs and rhymes using the names of Sing, Long, Chin, and Soot. The one I remember now went

 

Sing a song along with Chin, Sing a Long Song with Soot.

 

to which our mother added

 

Forsooth!

 

Neither my sister nor I knew what "forsooth" meant except that our mother said it and therefore it sounded right.

I never knew until now that "forsooth" means "certainly" or "in truth," and that today's use of the word is usually sarcastic. Despite the fact that it reminded me of the Sing/Song/Long/Chin sing-along I did not look up "forsooth" in a dictionary after hearing it used by Richard Nixon's Quaker mother in the Oliver Stone film "Nixon."

That word, in particular its sound as enunciated by Mary Steenburgen in "Nixon", has lingered in my mind since childhood without definition or meaning.

My mind is likely flooded with such solitary words, glorious instruments that sit in my house like furniture, just as my days are flooded with lives I fail to comprehend.

 

 

Navvy

A laborer who is obliged to do menial work.

 

 

What does "work" mean, anyway? I hear it said once in a while that "they call it work for a reason," but some people's work is laborious and inescapable while the work of others is a cat and mouse game of expending as little energy as possible. But that is just labor. Paid work. Time compensated. What of the work that is the stuff of human relationships, that laborious scrutiny and cyclothymic backpedaling, forward-pedaling, vertical rising and falling within the emotional silos of our lives. And then there is my work. Your work. Anyone's work. A friend once commented that he liked my "work," speaking in reference to some photography I did a few years ago. I can accept that the act of taking and finding the things to photograph constitutes work, but I am not at ease with thinking that the finished product, hanging dead on a wall, is itself "work." I know that creative artists eventually catalogue their works, their complete works, but are these works different from, say, Water Works, in the Monopoly board game? Is the collected work of a painter something of a different order than a difficult situation that is made to work? How is the concept of a finished work of art different from an intangible form of work?

 

Deus ex Machina

Any active agent who appears unexpectedly to solve an insoluble difficulty.

 

 

The concept of irony was first introduced to me by a high school English teacher in a way that baffled me. She described irony as "reality differing from the masked appearance."

Neither I nor a single one of my fellow 9th grade classmates knew what our teacher was talking about. Her definition sounded, at best, like Bible verse -- parables, maybe. A feeling of inferiority and intellectual incompetence passed among us as she repeated her definition of "irony" many, many times.

Smiling a Cheshire grin her voice steadily decreased in volume until she was barely whispering the phrase "Reality differing from the masked appearance." She spoke through squinting eyes, through a seemingly knowing smile, through something like wisdom, through something that made the definition of "irony" impossible for us to decipher.

I would come to understand irony later that year, not at school (like so many things) but in a conversation with friends regarding the final episode of the television show "M*A*S*H". In that episode the Korean War ends and the American M*A*S*H personnel go home -- except for Sergeant Klinger. Klinger ended up staying having met and fallen in love with a local Korean woman.

"That," a friend of mine declared, "is irony!"

I noticed my friend's understanding of that word because I was still puzzled by my English teacher's "reality differing from the masked appearance" obscurity. Klinger staying in Korea is ironic because throughout the run of M*A*S*H his character made elaborate efforts to get kicked out of the service with a Section 8 discharge. Klinger, of all people, would have been the first one to get out of Korea when the opportunity presented itself, but it was he who ended up staying behind.

Irony!

My 9th grade English teacher's definition of irony has come to make a little bit of sense to me over time, but not much. It may be that its obtuseness is symptomatic of a general misunderstanding of irony, or for that matter a genuine discrepancy of the concept.

 

Fop-Doodle

A stupid or insignificant fellow; a fool; a simpleton.

I do not believe stupidity exists. I think it is a figment of insecure and nervous minds, and its invocation is a show of weakness and fear. The word, hurled, simply thuds. It can not travel far, the accusation of stupidity. How could it? Debate and discussion can not rise from stupidity any more than war can be fought by the dead. If someone labels me stupid then I regard their judgment as final and infallible.

 

Dejecta

Excrements; as, the dejecta of the sick.

 

 

One of the foulest images I ever saw on television came from the seemingly family-friendly program "America's Funniest Home Videos," as the show was called before being renamed "America's Funniest Videos," or "AFV."

I have not watched "AFV" since seeing this video, so my memory of the details may not be exact, but it went something like this: A crane or some sort of construction device was shown lifting objects near a Port-O-Let. The portable toilet was positioned on a raised piece of land, near a sharp drop of maybe 5 feet.

The crane inadvertently swung at the toilet, knocking it over and causing it to tumble off the edge of the hill. This caused the door to the portable toilet to pop open, revealing a well-dressed man with his pants down attempting to relieve himself. He fell forward and the portable toilet fell behind him, tipping over as its load of raw sewage poured out. The man was soaked in raw sewage.

And there the video ends. I have never been so ill from a television video. My head was swimming with nausea and revulsion, imagining what that might have felt like, how rank it must have smelled to be doused in the shit and piss of several other humans.

"AFV" had disgusted me before, but in reasonably acceptable ways involving the snot and vomit of babies, infants, and animals. But I had never seen anything like a man drowned in raw human waste matter.

 

Cloze

In language teaching, a cloze test is a test in which words are removed from a text and replaced with spaces. The task of the learner is to fill each space with the missing word or a suitable word.

 

 

I recently read of a company that developed a font with holes in it. After some research it was decided that a certain quantity of carefully placed holes could be left in printed text while readability was maintained.

The concept struck me as inane. Is there really an impending ink shortage in a world where publishers of all types have or will soon abandon print altogether for Internet and digital media?

Targeting print media with new cost-saving technologies is a bit like inventing a better payphone, the payphone being a once omnipresent technology that will survive mostly on the margins of society. I don't know if print media is doomed to a fate like the payphone, but I would think that any business whose income relies on money made from printed material is headed for hard times.

Nevertheless, in the interest of saving ink I have an alternate proposal. I say we print books with random words omitted. Algorithms must exist which could be used to omit the least necessary words -- that is, words most readers could assume through context rather than by literally being included in print. Research has been done into the readability of jumbled text but I would be interested in studies into the readability of texts with words omitted.

This is, of course, the stuff of poetry. Is succinctness of expression something we can trust to an algorithm? It could be fun to try.

 

Furcate

Forked; branching like the prongs of a fork.

 

 

A friend and I were at a Yankees baseball game when we both noticed a man with a physical defect. His right arm ended just past his elbow with two small, malformed fingers forming a half-blossomed hand. The fingers were slightly webbed and there appeared to be no palm of this hand, which was visible just under the sleeve of the man's t-shirt.

My friend asked me "Do you know what that is?" "What do you mean?" I asked. She said she couldn't be 100% certain but the man's hand looked like that of a classic "Thalidomide Baby," making this man one of only about ten or twelve-thousand people born between 1957 and 1962 with birth defects attributed the mother's use of Thalidomide.

Thalidomide, developed by a German pharmaceuticals company, was a drug intended to relieve symptoms of morning sickness. Poor testing of the product, however, led to thousands of women giving birth to severely malformed babies. Many of those babies did not survive past childhood, but those who did would be about the age of the man we saw at Yankee Stadium that day. His arm was afflicted with phocomelia, while other Thalidomide babies were born with extra appendages, missing eyes, shortened legs, and other ailments.

My friend knows a lot about the condition, and she remarked how unusual it was to have seen one of the relatively small number of people on earth who made it to adulthood having been born a "Thalidomide Baby."

 

This page is an archive of entries from January 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

December 2008 is the previous archive.

March 2009 is the next archive.

 

 



 

wander around sorabji.com: